![]() First, Omar praised Blinken for lifting the Trump-era sanctions. insists the ICC lacks the power to make.) Omar vocally opposed the sanctions-as did the European Union, the president of the ICC’s Assembly of States Parties, Senator Patrick Leahy, and, presumably, anyone skeptical of America’s willingness to look into its own savagery abroad.Ĭaitlin Flanagan: Ilhan Omar’s opportunityĭuring a June 7 budget hearing, Omar asked Secretary of State Antony Blinken a series of questions based on the ICC incident. (The ICC recognizes the State of Palestine as a party to its governing statute, a decision that the U.S. and Israel aren’t members of the ICC, the court has no right to adjudicate such matters. war crimes in Afghanistan as well as potential Israeli crimes in the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza, arguing that because the U.S. In 2020, the Trump administration imposed sanctions on International Criminal Court prosecutors who moved to investigate potential U.S. ![]() Now, following Democratic outrage and Republican calls for a floor vote to strip Omar of her committee assignments, let me record the following for posterity: Omar demonstrably did not say what she’s been accused of having said what she did say was true and every politico using this opportunity to take a swing at her likely knows those two things-they just think you don’t. They had already managed to make a news cycle out of it: mission accomplished. By the time Republicans and centrist Democrats had united late last week to scold Representative Ilhan Omar for a tweet-one of the few pastimes that still draw the two parties together, and something those selfsame chiders would doubtlessly decry, under different circumstances, as cancel culture or censorship-it no longer mattered what, exactly, Omar had said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |